by Ramses » 25 Aug 2009, 18:35
yes yes yes we're all imperfect somehow, i get the ideas here.
however, i agree with this maxim to a greater or lesser extent, depending on what fur is being used as an example.
i still haven't met any of you, and i am not accusing anyone here of being anything. this being said, the few furs i've met in my time have all been bad stereotypes of unsociable, unnattractive geeks.
i like to party, flirt and make out with really pretty sluts in bars, violently drunk-argue, make fun of people really hard, and throw objects at/through bus stops. i was not fitting in with the crowd discussing akhira (whatever the hell that is) and drinking rc cola in a dank basement full of fantasy board games and star trek fanfic paperbacks. the fact i really enjoy shamelessly flirting with the hottest thing i can find without any fear put me in a very small minority.
now, i am not superior to those people. at all. but between my experiences with them, and the language and topics and thoughts of most furs on the internet, i am led to conclude there are a hell of alot of furs out there like those guys i hung out with.
this conclusion agrees with this cupro guy's thought. alot of passive hobbyists with or without non-fur (should we say skin?) friends. alot of serious ones with zero social skills totally beyond repair.
this is what the guy was getting at. too bad he had to beat around the bush so much. he wasn't looking for an essay disecting the word broken. he meant all furs are losers to a large or small degree. i only partially agree with this. i think 'all" should be replaced by 'most'.
sorry everyone, we're a bunch of wierdos and geeks and losers.
but hey. this is just my one opinion.