


Ashley wrote:I don't really appreciate the maturity demonstrated by Capital Furs admins by resorting to image meme trolling in this warning thread. It sets a pretty low brow example for others.
Today, Monday the 10th is the first I’ve heard of this. Probably because I’ve never added anyone to my MSN in weeks, with one single exception, where I warned someone that if they attempted a foolish at a convention I staff, like they had another, they would be removed from the convention by police force if necessary. (I think we all know what that incident refers to and it wasn’t a flame)
Aside from that, I haven’t added anyone to MSN and haven’t been trolling anyone. I would appreciate it if someone were to reveal what MSN accounts that ‘I’ was supposedly using to do this. My MSN account is cameraonat82@hotmail.com and I have this suspicion that the address ‘I’ used wasn’t mine at all; because it wasn’t me.
I had an interesting event happen to me on Saturday evening myself and after reading this thread I believe that it is connected and likely the same person pretending to be me. Someone, claiming to be a furry visiting Ottawa and ‘knew my furry friends’ asked me to go ‘hang out with them’ but refused to say who these furry friends were. It was pretty creepy and I had actually posted about it, including a log, on CrushYiffDestroy after midnight on Saturday (I guess Sunday morning).
http://crushyiffdestroy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3629
I regret to inform you but the admins are falsely warning this forum’s membership. And be honest, when have I ever actually flat out flamed someone? I don’t flame people. I make snide remarks that I actually believe in. That’s my style.
However, there is a bright side to this situation and that is that I have an archnemesis apparently. How many people can say that?
In the future I would appreciate it if Capital Furs admins took the bare minimum effort to ensure their warnings were accurate before using their forum as a medium to denounce a person to the entire fandom of a city.

Meer wrote:You do realize that the only way someone could 'copy' him is if they took his email addy right? The complaint we received was concerning Ashes email address, not his name directly.

Meer wrote:I'm not at liberty to display information like conversation logs that frankly, don't involve you. We're not policing MSN and as such the logfile itself is inconsequential, suffice it to say complaints were made and align perfectly with his behavior in the recent past, and his email was provided by the complaintent as the email address of the member that had added and flamed him.
Knowing full well you either are Ashes, or one of his 'friends', I would say your biases in the matter would make your opinion suspect anyway, so I don't see any reason to give your accusations and Ashes brilliantly biased and outright vengeful behavior much thought.
That being said, your 'whistle blowing' is noted and Ashes' displeasure at dealing with the consequences of his actions is respectfully disregarded. He may still be infatuated with us, but we're pretty much done with him.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests